Monica Lewinsky Inductive Reasoning Essay - 1,607 words

... or leave friends, children, or anyone else they love behind. Therefore, C Chivalry is alive. A. R. G.


Conditions Conductive Argument P 1 A- known to be a priori true R- positive relevance P 2 A- matter of common knowledge R- positive relevance P 3 A- matter of common knowledge R- positive relevance P 4 A-known to a priori true R- positive relevance P 5 A- matter of common knowledge R- positive relevance P 1 - 5 G- all grounds for cogent argument Counter Argument P 1 A- Highly refutable, not acceptable R- positive relevance P 2 A- premise is refutable on the basis of common knowledge R- positive relevance P 3 A- highly refutable R- positive relevance P 4 A- vague or ambiguous, not acceptable R- positive relevance P 5 A- begs the question R- positive relevance P 1 - 5 G- all grounds for argument Argument # 3 Inductive Reasoning P 1 On an average day in North Carolina, 100 women are victims of rape or attempted rape and many others are battered, predominantly by men that they know. P 2 The population is bigger in California than in North Carolina. So probably, P 3 On an average day in the California, over 100 women are victims of rape or attempted rape and many others are battered, predominantly by men that they know. P 4 Rape is a form of assault to a woman, and assaulting a woman shows no respect for a woman. P 5 Respecting a woman is a rule under the code of chivalry. Therefore, C Chivalry is dead.


A. R. G. Conditions First, we will test the premises of the sub argument for acceptability. P 1 is acceptable based on testimony. P 2 is acceptable based on common knowledge.


Next, we will test for relevance. Both of the premises are positively relevant to the conclusion. Finally, we test for good grounds. Both premises being acceptable and relevant, therefore, there are good grounds for the conclusion.


Now we will move on to the whole argument. P 4 is acceptable based on common knowledge. P 5 is acceptable a priori based on the code of chivalry. The sub argument, P 4, and P 5 are all positively relevant to the conclusion. There are also good grounds provided for the conclusion. Therefore, this argument is cogent.


Counter Argument P 1 60 % of men polled at Cal Poly open doors for women. So probably, P 3 Around 60 % of men in San Luis Obispo open doors for women. P 4 Opening a door for a woman is a sign of respect. P 5 Showing respect for a woman is a rule under the code of chivalry.


Therefore, C Chivalry is not dead. The previous argument also uses inductive reasoning. We are applying the statistics we found true at Cal Poly to the population of San Luis Obispo. We feel that this sample is representative because we polled a total of 68 people at various locations on campus, including the recreation center, the library, the lighthouse, the campus store, the university union, and the business building breeze way. We also feel that this sample can apply to the population of San Luis Obispo because Cal Poly students account for a large amount of the population of the city. A.


R. G. Conditions Now we must take the argument through A. R. G. First, we deal with the sub argument.


P 1 is acceptable because of testimony. It is also positively relevant to the conclusion and as a result of the above paragraph it also provides good grounds for the conclusion. Now we move on to the whole argument. P 4 is acceptable based on common knowledge. P 5 is acceptable a priori based on the code of chivalry.


The sub argument, P 4, and P 5 are all positively relevant to the conclusion. Based on the fact that all the premises are acceptable and relevant to the conclusion, there are good grounds. This argument is also cogent. Argument # 4 Analogy "The president of the United States is a citizen who is entitled to represent the people of the United States and we look up to him as a role model. Recently, the president lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. If our president lies, then it shows us that it is okay to lie.


Lying goes against the code of chivalry. Therefore, seeing the president's actions, chivalry is dead. P 1 The president is a citizen who is entitled to represent the people of the United States. P 2 We, as citizens, look up to the President as a role model. P 3 The president lied about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. (Christian Scien ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

...................You are reading a preview................... Visit our Blog and Unlock Full Access to this essay

Continue READING the FULL Essay by clicking HERE

Essay Tags: common knowledge, monica lewinsky, inductive reasoning, counter argument, economic prosperity

This is an Essay sample / Research paper, you can use it for your research of: Monica Lewinsky Inductive Reasoning